Manawatu/Rangitikei Intensive

Model Description

This model is situated on flat to easy rolling country in the Manawatu and Rangitikei districts. The model farm is 393 effective hectares (ha), 303 owned and 90 leased. The annual rental on the lease block is $36,000 ($400/ha).

The core activity on the model farm is lamb and cattle finishing, but includes a 1500 ewe flock. Some contract grazing of stock for other farmers also occurs, in the form of 570 lambs for 11 weeks and 170 dairy heifers for 50 weeks.

Lambs, steers and young bulls are purchased for finishing, mostly over autumn and winter.

Table 1: The Model in Summary 2003/04

Effective area:

393 ha

Total stock units wintered:

5,657 su

Opening stock wintered:

 

Breeding cows

0 hd

Breeding ewes

1,500 hd

R1yr cattle

176 hd

Replacement ewe hoggets

500 hd

R2yr cattle

316 hd

Other sheep

920 hd

Other cattle

0 hd

Table 2: Key Parameters

 

2000/01

2001/02

2002/03

2003/04

2004/05f

Effective area (ha)

346

393

393

393

393

Opening sheep stock units

2,580

2,765

3,089

2,496

2,566

Opening cattle stock units

2,508

1,820

1,900

2,284

2,305

Opening total stock units

5,088

4,585

4,989

4,780

4,871

Stocking rate (su/ha)

14.7

11.7

12.7

12.16

12.39

Ewe lambing %

132

134

129

122

128

Average lamb price ($/hd)

74

83

69

69

69

Average wool price ($/kg)

2.63

3.03

3.07

2.78

2.74

Total wool produced (kg)

12,794

15,760

14,832

14,822

13,820

Wool production (kg/ssu)

5.0

5.7

5.3

5.9

5.4

Average 30-month bull ($/hd)

1,162

1,410

908

996

944

Gross farm revenue ($)

430,409

397,111

408,165

449,552

444,078

Cash farm surplus ($)

218,540

93,987

110,929

132,957

119,293

Net trading profit ($)

155,047

108,248

70,717

114,152

125,928

Key Points

  • Flooding in February 2004 caused business disruption and additional repairs and maintenance costs, but not the degree of stock or pasture loss at first feared. Very mild conditions in April and May resulted in good pasture growth rates, and farmers did not have to send stock off for grazing.
  • Crops suffered significant damage, with many farmers commenting that poor yields barely covered expenses.
  • Farmers are relieved by the depreciating New Zealand dollar (NZD) and the corresponding lift in product prices, especially during May 2004.
  • Stock prices throughout the year were better than predicted in most farmer budgets.

Physical Factors

A dry autumn in 2003 reduced feed covers and lowered conception rates in ewes and hoggets. However, the average lambing percentage of 124% pleasantly surprised many farmers.

A cold spring followed, restricting lamb and cattle growth rates. However, from December until the flooding event of 15/16 February, good pasture growth rates occurred.

In this model, flood damage did not affect stock production, but additional repair costs were incurred.

Farmers believe that the full psychological impact of the flood is yet to be felt. Farms are very exposed to the effects of any further heavy rain, as riverbanks are damaged and little repair work has been undertaken. Many large logs in stream beds could inflict further damage, particularly to bridges.

During the floods mobs and herds became mixed, resulting in unplanned early ewe pregnancies. Later, good pasture management was not possible with so many fences down. High winds 2 days later brought down trees, but pasture feed supplies and stock prices held up well, which helped restore farmer morale.

Competition for finishing stock was intense with more and more farmers moving to trading stock only farming systems. Those who held on to stock into May and June benefited from a significant lift in late season schedule prices.

Many cash crops were destroyed or did not warrant harvesting following the February floods. This has further discouraged cropping as seasons have been poor over the last 3 years.

Farmers trading large numbers of lambs did well as margins improved throughout the autumn and early winter.

Some farmers lost stock to Salmonella as outbreaks occurred around Wanganui and Hunterville. Those affected are now vaccinating against further outbreaks.

Nitrogen use is increasing, with heavier rates and more frequent applications.

Financial Factors

2003/04 Review

Revenue

Gross farm revenue (net of livestock purchases) increased from $408,165 to $449,552 in 2003/04. This is significantly better than forecast, mostly attributable to high stock schedules.

However, at times during the year, margins for both lambs and cattle were squeezed as the East Coast had a good summer and farmers were able to finish a lot of their own stock.

Some traders were able to take advantage of cheap store lambs from the South Island, which reduced lamb purchase prices, typically by $10/hd.

There is a trend towards finishing sheep rather than cattle, resulting in a reduction in the capital value of stock.

Net proceeds from the 16 ha of crop in this model amounted to only $1,440 in total, due to flood damage occurring very close to harvest.

Stock losses from the floods were not significant.

Table 3: Stock Values for Forecast for Trading Stock (average of 20 surveyed farms)

 

Buy Price
$

Sell Price
$

Margin
$

Bought-in lambs

56.60

69.20

12.60

R1yr steers

490

856

366

R2yr steers

820

1,010

190

R1yr bulls

295

770

475

R2yr bulls

630

996

366

Table 4: Cash Farm Revenue ($)

 

Actual
2001/02

Actual
2002/03

Estimate
2003/04

Forecast
2004/05

Sheep sales less purchases

168,227

171,388

182,732

164,931

Cattle sales less purchases

154,303

164,250

166,905

176921

Wool

47,753

45,534

41,205

37867

Other income

26,828

8,150

58,710

64,360

Gross farm revenue

397,111

408,165

449,552

444,078

Expenditure

Total cash farm expenditure increased in 2003/04 by 14% on the previous year. This reflected higher spending on animal health, electricity, feed, freight, seeds, rates, and repairs and maintenance.

Some increase in labour and repairs and maintenance costs was a direct result of flooding clean-up.

Many farmers are deferring expenditure on fertiliser as the autumn was especially mild and feed levels are abundant. There is a trend towards stretching out regrassing schedules to avoid the high cash cost.

The Rangitikei area has experienced a 70% increase in rateable values in the last 3 years. Many farmers are disputing these new valuations, but they seem well justified based on recent market sales.

Telecommunication costs are escalating as farmers make more use of the services.

Debt servicing costs have increased, and are expected to continue to go up as the Reserve Bank moves to curb inflation.

Farmers are spending more on stock handling facilities as some good options for efficient handling of stock, especially sheep, are now available.

Net Result

The cash farm surplus moved from $111,354 to $132,957 reflecting higher gross revenue. Cash farm expenditure was also up, but not as much.

The net trading profit before tax increased from $71,142 to $114,152, and is better than the forecast figure. Higher than anticipated stock values are the main reason.

Manawatu/Rangitikei Intensive Profitability Trends

Manawatu/Rangitikei Intensive Profitability Trends

2004/05 Forecast

Revenue

Gross farm revenue is expected to remain very near to 2003/04 levels. A small decline from $449,552 to $444,078 is expected. Interestingly, farmers expect less for wool despite the recent fall in the NZD. More and more farmers are moving to trading and are carrying fewer breeding stock, so margins may be under pressure. However, with a high lambing percentage predicted for this spring, more lambs should be available.

Table 5: Stock Values for Forecast for Trading Stock (average of 20 surveyed farms)

 

Buy Price
$

Sell Price
$

Margin
$

Bought-in lambs

55.30

68.60

13.30

R1yr steers

560

923

363

R2yr steers

741

1,026

285

R1yr bulls

324

839

515

R2yr bulls

494

944

450

Expenditure

Cost increases are forecast for labour, animal health, fuel, freight, rates and shearing. This will be offset by reduced spending on fertiliser (despite price rises) and feed. Overall cash farm expenditure is predicted to increase for the model by $6,000, or $17/ha.

Net Result

As noted above the gross revenue is lower and cash farm expenditure is higher, leading to a fall in the cash farm surplus from $132,957 to $119,293.

Net trading profit before tax is expected to rise from $114,152 to $125,928, mainly as a result of a large increase in livestock valuation.

Drawings are expected to increase by $1,000 to offset inflation, development expenditure to decrease from $7,467 to $3,537, and capital purchases to reduce from $41,208 to $18,000.

Issues and Trends

As the model is largely a sheep and beef finishing operation, it was not as badly affected by the 15/16 February floods as were cropping farmers and sharemilkers. There is great uncertainty about who will pay for river repairs, and by when. Many farmers feel very exposed to any further downpours. On the model farm there was no forced destocking, but certainly normal farm management was disrupted. Controlling feed and pastures has been difficult and in some areas access is still difficult, especially to airstrips.

Favourable grass growing conditions since the flood have helped to offset any silted pastures.

Despite the floods, land prices have moved up sharply. Most sales have been to existing farmers, but now it is difficult to show a competitive return or grow the business when returns on capital are typically 2-3%.

Surveyed farmers are getting older and the price of land is making it more and more difficult for younger people to set up their own farming business.

Surveyed farmers in the model live close to urban centres, and are becoming increasingly wary of those clutching clipboards administering regulations regarding building codes, effluent disposal, fencing off of waterways, stock on roads, fertiliser and chemical application. Farmers say these are all costs without benefit, which will lead to New Zealand becoming less competitive.

Farmers are using helicopters more for fertiliser topdressing. Placement is more accurate and many older airstrips are being banned from use by Civil Aviation. Farmers are concerned that half the airstrips could be closed down.

Farmers are critical of the Land Transport Authority, claiming they are too draconian with their rulings and their staff are not well trained.

The HSNO Act looms, and farmers say that this will impose yet more costs on their farming operation.

Animal health compliance annoys some farmers. For instance, penicillin is now not able to be purchased and used to assist ewes after difficult births.

Many farmers have had enough of bulls. They believe they are not getting paid for the additional management difficulties, and are buying steers instead. However, there is still some demand for Techno systems.

The establishment of the new Canterbury Meat Packers plant at Marton will lead to even more competition for lambs.

Some Salmonella was experienced around Wanganui and Hunterville.

McCains are pulling out of pea processing in the Manawatu, restricting farmer crop choices.

Inland Revenue is focusing more on farming, with more audits and careful examination of qualifying repairs and maintenance costs. A review of depreciation rates is also occurring, which may result in lower rates for farm homes and buildings.

Farmers are restructuring their farm ownership to spread tax.

The high price of land is making farm succession as difficult as ever.

Consultants are advising farmers to use ACC Cover Plus policy.

Slow Internet connection speeds and poor cell phone coverage continue to frustrate farmers.

Manawatu/Rangitikei Intensive Budget

 

2003/04 
$

 

2004/05f 
$

 

Whole farm

per ha

per su

 

Whole farm

per ha

per su

Revenue

             

Sheep

333,027

847

133.42

 

320,426

815

124.87

Wool

41,205

105

16.51

 

37,867

96

14.76

Cattle

285,620

727

125.05

 

297,396

757

107.95

Grazing income

57,270

146

10.12

 

49,320

125

8.03

Other farm income

1,440

4

0.25

 

15,040

38

2.45

Less:
Sheep purchases

150,295

382

60.21

 

155,495

396

60.60

Cattle purchases

118,715

302

51.98

 

120,475

307

43.73

Gross farm revenue

449,552

1,144

79.46

 

444,078

1,130

72.35

Cash farm expenditure

229,296

583

40.53

 

235,786

600

38.41

Interest

51,300

131

9.07

 

53,000

135

8.63

Rent and/or leases

36,000

92

6.36

 

36,000

92

5.86

Cash farm surplus

132,957

338

23.50

 

119,293

304

19.43

Stock value adjustment

8,572

22

1.52

 

34,774

88

5.67

Minus depreciation

27,377

70

4.84

 

28,139

72

4.58

Net trading profit

114,152

290

20.18

 

125,928

320

20.52

Taxation

10,616

27

1.88

 

32,844

84

5.35

Net trading profit after tax

103,536

263

18.30

 

93,084

237

15.16

Allocation of Funds              

Add back depreciation

27,377

70

4.84

 

28,139

72

4.58

Reverse stock value adjustment

-8,572

-22

-1.52

 

-34,774

-88

-5.67

Drawings

45,000

115

7.95

 

46,000

117

7.49

Principal repayments

16,059

41

2.84

 

15,000

38

2.44

Development

7,467

19

1.32

 

3,537

9

0.58

Capital purchases

41,208

105

7.28

 

18,000

46

2.93

Disposable surplus/deficit

12,607

32

2.23

 

3,912

10

0.64

Other Cash Sources

             

New borrowing

40,000

102

7.07

 

1,000

3

0.16

Off-farm income

5,000

13

0.88

 

5,000

13

0.81

Other cash income

0

0

0.00

 

0

0

0.00

Net cash change

57,607

147

10.18

 

9,912

25

1.61

Assets and Liabilities

             

Farm, forest and building (opening)

2,704,578

6,882

478.04

 

4,545,000

11,565

740.43

Plant and machinery (opening)

132,510

337

23.42

 

138,842

353

22.62

Stock valuation (opening)

481,814

1,226

85.16

 

490,386

1,248

79.89

Total farm capital

3,318,902

8,445

586.63

 

5,174,228

13,166

842.94

Total debt opening

650,000

1,654

114.89

 

650,000

1,654

105.89

Equity (farm assets-liabilities)

2,668,902

6,791

471.74

 

4,524,228

11,512

737.05

 

2003/04 
$

 

2004/05f 
$

 

Whole farm

per ha

per su

 

Whole farm

per ha

per su

Farm Working Expenses

             

Permanent wages

0

0

0.00

 

0

0

0.00

Casual wages

28,689

73

5.07

 

29,475

75

4.80

ACC

4,008

10

0.71

 

5,710

15

0.93

Animal health

13,755

35

2.43

 

14,148

36

2.30

Breeding

1,572

4

0.28

 

1,572

4

0.26

Electricity

7,074

18

1.25

 

7,860

20

1.28

Feed (hay and silage)

5,895

15

1.04

 

4,323

11

0.70

Feed (crops)

0

0

0.00

 

0

0

0.00

Feed (grazing)

0

0

0.00

 

0

0

0.00

Feed (other)

0

0

0.00

 

0

0

0.00

Fertiliser

43,230

110

7.64

 

42,444

108

6.91

Lime

786

2

0.14

 

2,358

6

0.38

Farm forestry costs

0

0

0.00

 

0

0

0.00

Freight (not elsewhere deducted)

11,790

30

2.08

 

12,969

33

2.11

Regrassing costs (contractors)

5,109

13

0.90

 

5,895

15

0.96

Seeds

9,825

25

1.74

 

9,825

25

1.60

Shearing costs (per SSU)

20,500

52

3.62

 

21,000

53

3.42

Weed and pest control

3,930

10

0.69

 

3,144

8

0.51

Fuel

8,253

21

1.46

 

9,432

24

1.54

Vehicle costs (excluding fuel)

9,039

23

1.60

 

8,253

21

1.34

Repairs and maintenance

24,759

63

4.38

 

23,973

61

3.91

Communication costs (phone and mail)

2,751

7

0.49

 

3,144

8

0.51

Accountancy

3,537

9

0.63

 

3,537

9

0.58

Legal and consultancy

2,358

6

0.42

 

1,572

4

0.26

Other administration

2,751

7

0.49

 

2,358

6

0.38

Rates

11,004

28

1.94

 

11,790

30

1.92

Insurance

6,681

17

1.18

 

7,860

20

1.28

Other expenditure

2,000

5

0.35

 

3,144

8

0.51

Cash farm expenditure

229,296

583

40.53

 

235,786

600

38.41

               
Calculated Ratios              

Economic farm surplus (or EBIT)

137,263

349

24.26

 

139,928

356

22.80

Cash farm expenditure/GFR

51%

 

 

 

53%

 

 

EFS/total farm capital

4.1%

 

 

 

2.7%

 

 

EFS less interest & lease/equity

1.9%

 

 

 

1.1%

 

 

Interest+rent+lease/GFR

19.4%

 

 

 

20.0%

 

 

EFS/GFR

30.5%

 

 

 

31.5%

 

 

 

Economic farm surplus (EFS) is calculated as follows:
Gross revenue + change in livestock value-farm working expenses-depreciation-wages of management
Wages of management = 1% of opening total farm capital + $31,000 (to a maximum of $75,000)

Previous PageTable Of ContentsNext Page

Contact for Enquiries

Farm Monitoring Programme Manager
Monitoring and Evaluation
MAF Policy
PO Box 2526
Wellington
NEW ZEALAND
Phone: +64 4 894 0623
Fax: +64 4 894 0741
Contact this person