11. Risk Identification & Mitigation

11.1. Private sector investment

The following risks impact on the financial viability of a water enhancement scheme and therefore are risks to both debt and equity providers. The key difference between debt and equity risk is that debt providers (particularly under a business finance model) generally have their investment protected with some form of security while equity investors have their total investment exposed.

A schemes ability to raise debt and equity finance will be dependent on how well the following risks can be addressed and mitigated.

Risk

Examples

Mitigation

Construction risk

  • Construction overruns add significant cost to the total capital sum requiring additional funding exposure.
  • Time delays in completing and commissioning the scheme add significant cost to the capital sum and negatively impact on water users on-farm developments.
  • Research the background and financial strength of the construction company. Can they manage a contract of this capacity and absorb cost overruns if necessary.
  • Enter into fixed term, fixed price contracts with construction companies
  • Ensure strong penalty clauses or cost sharing arrangements are included within contracts for time delays and cost overruns
  • Consider risk transfer to DBO or BOOT provider

Environmental risk

(Supply risk)

  • New conditions attached to resource consent impacting on access to long-term water supply putting the scheme in jeopardy.
  • Significant additional cost incurred to rectify environmental damage caused by the scheme.
  • Ensure the scheme is always operated within the conditions of the resource consent.
  • Obtain insurance where possible to protect against large-scale environmental damage.
  • Consider risk transfer to DBO or BOOT provider

Take-up risk

  • Water users are slow to purchase rights to the scheme (waiting to see if it works first) making the scheme uneconomic for those users who have committed early.
  • Commitment is made but on-farm development is slow (capital constrained) impacting on a water users ability to meet charges.
  • Fully investigate the opportunities for staging the development to meet demand.
  • Ensure minimum commitment has been received from water users in the area prior to approaching a financier.
  • Negotiate with local and/or Central Government to secure revenue-underwriting support for the scheme.
  • Structure company in such a way that it is attractive for private investment lowering the requirement for water user equity.

Operating risk

  • Operating costs exceed financial forecasts making water uneconomic for water users to purchase.
  • Fix as many operating risks as possible to provide certainty i.e. fixed funding, electricity hedging environmental damage.
  • Consider risk transfer to DBO or BOOT provider.

Major maintenance risk (including natural disaster)

  • Scheme requires major unscheduled maintenance, imposing a significant cost on the scheme to be funded by water users.
  • Obtain insurance where possible to protect against large-scale maintenance and damage including loss of profits.
  • Consider risk transfer to DBO or BOOT provider

Climatic risks

  • Scheme generates no revenue from water users during very dry or very wet seasons, meaning revenue does not cover fixed costs.
  • Ensure water-user sign long-term take or pay contracts to cover fixed operating costs.

Commodity market risk

  • Commodity prices fall significantly reducing farm incomes to the point where users cannot meet water charges.
  • Provide research on commodity fluctuations and ensure that financial feasibility of the scheme is still valid given the expected fluctuations in commodity prices.

Water trading risk

  • Uncontrolled water trading forces the price of water rights to excessive amounts impacting on a new users ability to pay scheme water charges.
  • Formal water trading markets allow market forces to dictate the price for water and help to ensure that water is used most efficiently.

Political risk

  • Changes in legislation or regulation directly impacting on the scheme viability or on water user economics i.e. conditions imposed under the Kyoto Protocol
  • This is normal business risk

Public liability risk

  • Scheme pipe or dam bursts flooding houses, damaging property and crops. Scheme is sued for significant sum for damages
  • Obtain insurance where possible to protect against large-scale maintenance and damage including loss of profits.
  • Consider risk transfer to DBO or BOOT provider

Ownership structure risk

  • Scheme is structured as a Co-operative Company. Certain commodity prices fall, and therefore these users do not take water for a period. These users apply under legislation to have the company repurchase shares to remove any take or pay commitment impacting the financial viability of the remaining shareholders.
  • Ensure the ownership structure is the most appropriate for both debt and equity funding providers, with shares classes protecting investor objectives.

Bankruptcy risk

  • Corporate landowners enter long-term supply agreements, but go bankrupt when yields are low leaving the scheme limited recourse for recovery.
  • This is normal business risk
  • Scheme needs to be aware of any concentrations of credit risk with an individual property and manage these customers appropriately.

11.2 Public sector investment

Public sector financial assistance may be in the following forms:

  • provision of debt;
  • provision of equity or hybrid equity;
  • provision of financial guarantees;
  • provision underwriting revenue capacity.

Each form of assistance has a different risk profile and will depend on the provider of the assistance whether central or local government. Risks and risk mitigation related to central and local government financial assistance have been addressed within studies of their respective roles.

Table Of ContentsNext Page

Contact for Enquiries

MAF Information Services
Pastoral House
25 The Terrace
PO Box 2526
Wellington, NEW ZEALAND

Fax: +64 4 894 0721
Contact this person

 




WebSite survey